INTERACTIVE BLOGGING - YOU BE THE JURY

You be the Jury - Here is my case with an opportunity for you to present yours. 
by Barry Bozeman  Link to this post on SMSS 

WE have challenged certain statements and charges involving Presentment of the Attorney General, The Freeh Report, the Perjury Charges against Tim Curley and Gary Schultz and various other contentions by the Media, the PSU Board of Trustees, the Governor and the NCAA. The Second Mile Sandusky Scandal website and the FREEHdom Fighters invite your participation as we test the verisimilitude of certain theories and hypotheses. 

SMSS EXCLUSIVE - Scenes of the "Crime" for the 1st Time

SCENES OF THE CRIME SEEN for the FIRST TIME 
by Barry Bozeman, Ray Blehar & the FREEHdom Fighters.    LINK to this post on SMSS 

FINALLY after weeks of trying the FREEHdom Fighters have managed to get these pictures for an exclusive release to our viewers/readers. The party that provided these to us wants only donations to go to the Legal Fund that will be used to sue the NCAA and Louis Freeh. Please hit the DONATE button to the right with a small contribution to carry this fight to the NCAA and FREEH.

WE are going to show you 10 images of the Lasch Locker room along with the various versions of testimony under oath of Mike McQueary.about the night of  Feb 9, 2001.

Did Mike McQueary Commit Perjury? Walt Uhler

WALTER UHLER - DID MIKE MCQUEARY COMMIT PERJURY?  LINK to SMSS post 

On 12 June 2012, defense attorney Karl Rominger conducted a devastating cross examination of Mike McQueary in the course of attempting to defend the indefensible Jerry Sandusky. The actual transcript of that cross examination was not released until 21 September 2012, which explains why virtually nobody, except Barry Bozeman on The Second Mile Sandusky Scandal website, has written about the deliberate deception Rominger exposed.

Mike McQueary - Reality Challenged?

by Barry Bozeman   LINK to SMSS post 

Slogging through the Mike McQueary testimony and the cross-examination of Karl Rominger is tedious going.  I can't quite decide which is worse - McQueary's obfuscation and sometimes obvious evasion - pretending he doesn't understand the question OR Rominger's bizarre seemingly purposeful ineptitude and lack of focus. 

Dr. Dranov's Sandusky Trial Transcript

THE TESTIMONY OF DR. JOHNATHAN DRANOV in Transcript is now Available 
LINK to this post on SMSS 

We can now see word for word what Dr Dranov said that convinced the jury to find Sandusky not guilty on the prosecutions claim that Mike McQueary SAW a boy being subjected to anal intercourse and told that to Joe, Tim and Gary.

Mike McQueary heard sounds "of a sexual nature" SOUNDS!!!!

Mike McQueary was asked three times by his doctor - if he SAW anything Sexual "I kept saying what did you see and he kept coming back to the Sounds"

Definitive Case - McQueary NOT Believable - Ziegler

The Definitive Case McQueary's Story Is Not to be Believed

Submitted by John Ziegler on Thu, 09/06/2012 - 10:10  LINK to this post on SMSS 

Mike McQueary - Changing Testimony hurt JoePa

To my knowledge, never has so much damage been created, and punishment been levied, with so little evidence or even due process. Of the many absolutely incredible aspects of the Jerry Sandusky scandal, clearly the most underrated is that the direct connection to PSU hangs on the remarkably tenuous story of one man and about four words badgered out of an 84yearold coach trying not harm the prosecution’s case. 

2001 Freeh Framing - Strange Evidence & Fiction

Kelly Links Curley & Schultz to Jerry

By Barry Bozeman   LINK to this post on SMSS             When Linda Kelly stood before the public on Nov 7 with pictures of Tim Curley and Gary Schultz beside Jerry Sandusky and read the horrific charges against one and perjury charges against the other's you may not have decided that Tim and Gary were guilty of perjury.. But that made it easy for Louis Freeh to further prejudice us with his report saying Schultz tried to hide a "secret file" or leaking email that supposedly supported the claims of the prosecution. 

2004/04 Messageboard Chat Gives Investigators More McQueary Questions

by Barry Bozeman        LINK to this post on SMSS 

A Penn State message board member has given the Screen names and names of some of Mike McQueary's friends and acquaintances to the Curley/Schultz Attorneys investigative team. These investigators have confirmed information that gives us even more doubt about Attorney General Kelly's use of Mike McQueary as the most "Credible Witness". Statements were made in chats about the 2001 locker room visit by McQueary that resulted in the current situation at PSU. 

CHARLATAN VICTIMS : "VICTIM" TWO?

HOW QUICKLY THINGS CHANGE - we are reminded that there is much more to come.
by Barry Bozeman  LINK to this post on SMSS 
This story is likely to destroy the last shred of credibility that Mike McQueary had for his Feb 2001 story. MIke already destroyed his own accounts by all the variations in his story. See a fairly complete accounting of his changing story HERE - LINK,  The only remaining thing Mike had going for his story was the idea that Victim 2 was actually abused that night even if Mike never saw it.. Now it appears that not only was he not abused but he isn't victim 2. 

Shortly after the end of the Jerry Sandusky Trial we were greeted by a plethora of articles stating Victim 2 in JerrySandusky case comes forward, plans to sue Penn State  

Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2012/07/26/3274073/victim-2-in-jerry-sandusky-case.html#storylink=cpy

These articles were accompanied by what was termed "Chilling Phone Calls" that in reality appear to be anything but chilling:

I'm Mad as Hell and I'm not going to take it anymore

2 Second McQueary Visualizations: Who's Responsible for the Damage to PSU & JVP?
by Barry Bozeman    LINK to this post on SMSS 

This should be interesting. When you really get into actual testimony the idea that Joe, Tim, Gary or Dr. Spanier should be blamed for not dealing correctly with Mike's 2001 2 second visualizations may seem silly. The fact that Penn State and these men are being dragged through the mud over a decade old decision because of what a shocked assistant coach 'might have said about 2 second glances is just plain crazy.

McQueary Testimony - Known Facts & My Opinion

STORY OF McQUEARY TESTIMONIES ACCORDING TO KNOWN FACTS

by Barry Bozeman  LINK to this post on SMSS 

To my PSU friends: In the ongoing discussion of the culpability of AD Curley and VP Schultz it seems as if two camps have developed. This constitutes my complete argument on behalf of the beleaguered AD and VP and thus PSU based on as much evidence as is available.
Perhaps the major difference is generational in our initial reaction to the idea of man and boy in shower. Perhaps we differ in our opinion of the competence of police over university administrators. But this is a serious defense of PSU in the person of it's administrators and the reasonableness of assuming that JS should have been stopped in 2001.

McQueary Testimony - Major Change

McQueary Testimony Changes - Moves 13 Months Forward in Time
by Barry Bozeman  Link to this post on SMSS 

This could really change everything for PSU in the Sandusky case. and this should truly concern all PSU alumni, students, and supporters. Court paperwork filed Monday, by prosecutors says the alleged sexual incident McQueary claims to have seen between Sandusky and a young boy in a locker room shower didn’t actually happen the Friday before spring break in 2002. It happened Feb. 9, 2001, about 13 months earlier. This puts at least part of the case beyond the statute of limitations.